“The descendants of the convicts in Australia should inspire in us nothing but a feeling of supreme indifference.

If their vitality is not strong enough to enable them to increase at a rate proportionate to the size of the territories they occupy, that is their own look-out, and it is no use their appealing to us for help. For my own part, I have no objection at all to seeing the surplus populations of prolific Asia being drawn, as to a magnet, to their empty spaces. Let them all work out their own salvation! And let me repeat – it is nothing to do with us.”

February 7 1945. (Hitler’s Testament)

As Witnessed by
Dr. Joseph Goebbels,
Martin Bormann,
General Wilhelm Burgdorf,
and General Hans Krebs.

Sources:

  • Kershaw, Ian (2008). Hitler: A Biography. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-06757-6. Page 950
  • https://archive.org/details/TheTestamentOfAdolfHitler ; Page 19

Adolf Hitler: A hero for Germany, not for Australia.

Read more

Deakin

Alfred Deakin regarding hysteria about anti-semitism in Russia. 9th November 1905

I hesitate to believe that such incredible atrocities as have been reported can have been perpetrated by any Christian people. The state of affairs in Russia is, at the present time, so chaotic that I suspect that the means of obtaining intelligence as to what is proceeding there is even less trustworthy than usual. Therefore, until satisfied of the substantial truth of the statements which have been made, we might, by carrying such a resolution as the honorable and learned member has referred to, place an undeserved imputation upon a great people who are in the throes of profound political and social change.

I am sure that the whole Australian community wishes well to the Russian people in their struggles for constitutional liberty and freedom, and that the civilized world would join in reprobation of such horrible outrages as have been reported in the columns of the press. If the newspaper statements are established on some foundation making them sufficiently credible,I shall be prepared to consider whether anything said or done in Australia will help to bring to bear upon those who have been guilty of these fearful offences, the whole weight of civilized public opinion throughout the world.

Givens, Henry

Henry Thomas Givens regarding the Jewish control over South Africa

The war in South Africa was undertaken ostensibly for the purpose of securing the rights of the Uitlanders – for securing the franchise for the British subjects there resident.

Whether that object is likely to be accomplished remains to be seen, but up to the present that has not been the result; because in the Transvaal no individual has the right to the franchise, nor does there seem to be any probability of the right being extended in the near future.

Present events appear to confirm my belief that the war was undertaken merely in the interests of mining magnates, and not in the interests of the British people – that it was undertaken in order to satisfy the cupidity and greed of mining speculators, who are not even our own fellowcitizens, but in many instances are continental Jews – men who do not care a straw for the prosperity, well-being, or advancement, and progress of the British race, and are only concerned about their own miserable, dirty profits.

nla.obj-146269451-1

Francis Foster regarding Public Borrowing, 2nd July 1909

I am proud of the Commonwealth Parliament, because it has pronounced against public borrowing. I have told the people that they need never be afraid that this Parliament will increase the public debt by borrowing from the German Jews of London’, pawning the country’s inheritance. But now I see it mooted in the press, and I hear whispers to the effect, that this Government is preparing to borrow.

nla.obj-146270153-1

Ernest Carr

This is indeed high finance; I never heard anything like it. An honorable member asks if I still say the officials are not business men. They can be business men without being absolute Jews.

William_Archibald

William Archibald

The honorable member is arguing like a Petticoat Lane Jew.

Frank Tudor

Frank Tudor

No doubt the honorable member is a good authority on Petticoat Lane, and on Jews also. He looks as wise as an owl, but is as simple as a kewpie.

Read more

Sydney Revival

The purpose of life is to struggle as hard as you can for what you believe in, and enjoy the struggle.
George L. Rockwell

National Socialism is a very powerful political idealism, its origins are dubious – and its ideals too are hard to pin down. We will strive to understand National Socialism today through the lens of the ever famous George Lincoln Rockwell.

Rockwell made the argument that National Socialism was the understanding that society should be structured around the well-being of Nations, and that society should be structured upon unchanging naturally occurring laws of order and practice: We absolutely agree with this sentiment.

National Socialist symbolism, both in history and to this day – has been laden with the Swastika ; now this isn’t specifically a ~Germanic~ symbol; it’s frequently found in other indo-european cultures – but regardless of that: In the mind of history, the swastika is firmly a German Nationalist symbol; ownership of the swastika being rightfully earned with the blood spilled for it in the second world war.

white ausThe Eureka Youth League does not self-identify as “National Socialist” for a few reasons.  First and foremost; we believe in Australianism, an ideology that pre-dates National Socialism by more than 40 years. Whilst Adolf Hitler was still a baby in his crib, the founding statesmen of Australia were instituting the pillars of a White man’s working democracy. We have a vast and glorious history of racially motivated national politics in this country and have no need to source our inspiration from the European continent.

Flags copyAustralianist movements like the Eureka Youth League have no need to take advantage of the Swastika. Although for marketing purposes it is a very powerful symbol; as confessed by George L Rockwell. The Swastika is not an Australian symbol, the Eureka Youth League believes in the native-born nationalist symbols forged in blood and toil by OUR forefathers.

Foremost is our flag; The Lambing’s Flat flag – historically branded with the slogan “Roll up – No Chinese” this is a flag that contains the Christian cross of St. Andrew, the Southern Cross and gloriously: the heritage of successfully driving the colored races off the gold-fields and eventually out of Australia.

The Eureka Youth League and its supporters would like to extend our hand to the other groups of Racially Nationalist sentiment across the continent, for ultimately our goals are one: But we will never forget out utmost loyalty to the Australian struggle, forged in the battles and trials of our pioneers in the middle of the 19th century – right through to the genuine nationalists of 2017 who toil for the restoration and preservation of a White Australia.

 

Lambings Flat

The Lambings Flat Rebellion 1860-1861

We were struggling among ourselves for supremacy in a world which we thought of as destined to belong to the Aryan races and to the Christian faith; to the letters and arts and charm of social manners which we have inherited from the best times of the past. We shall wake to find ourselves elbowed and hustled, and perhaps even thrust aside by peoples whom we looked down upon as servile, and thought of as bound always to minister to our needs. The solitary consolation will be that the changes have been inevitable.

Is that not something to guard against ? I do not pretend to say that there is any immediate danger of that kind, but unless we are careful dangers of that kind are inevitable as time goes on. I do not want to exaggerate them in any way. I do not want to pretend that unless we pass this Bill today we shall have these people coming in in such volume as to overflow and throng our marts, our fields, and all places of our industry. But it is enough that if we do not take action and take it speedily, both the commercial and industrial difficulties of this kind of labour will be growing tendencies which we shall one day repent our not having checked. These are not new opinions of mine ; I have expressed them over and over again, and hold them as strongly, and I think even more strongly, with reference to the prevention of certain Asiatic influxes, as I did when a youth.

Prime Minister Edmund Barton.
Addressing the First Australian Parliament 1901

Read more

ca91bb85ea5e2a5694f0ac0c74ba5cb9

Based upon a book called “The Authoritarian Personality” published in 1950 by a team of anti-western Jews ( Theodor W. Adorno, Else Frenkel-Brunswik, Daniel Levinson, Nevitt Sanford ) ; this book lists and details a set of unique qualities to the western man that uphold a combination of political, social, economic and cultural values that equate to the traditional Western Social and Political order.

If any man is to invest time into developing his character; he should aim generally towards these traits.

Conventionalism ; The belief in self-established, unconditional and objective societal conventions for the structure of society. For a m76c4ca53aba56684043e2ec308d6a954an this means belief in family gender roles, not just the domestic duty of the wife – but the natural duties of the man! No  hypocritical Husband will bear a healthy family. 

Authoritarianism ; The desire for the forceful, direct or indirect suppression of all threats to the natural/established order. For a man this means protecting your family by force, This means weeding out bad personality behaviors within the family through means of reasonable discipline. ( absolutely not outright abuse )

Anti-Intellectualism ; A hostility towards and mistrust of intellect, intellectuals, and intellectual pursuits; this referring to the University-bred elitist vermin who experiment with hyper-idealist belief systems that oppose Functionalism and Christianity at a base level. For a man this means producing an atmosphere of thinking and organising in the family that doesn’t lean on broken marxist dogmas.

Anti-Intraception An extention of Anti-Intellectualism, defined by Oxford as “A dislike of subjectivity and imagination. ” In our circumstance its reference to the dislike of imaginative lies like the existence of 76 Genders, Racial Equality, Gender Equality – all un-natural man-made : subjectively established beliefs. – For a man this means having a pragmatic family; Not using hyper-idealistic ( often marxist ) worldviews to establish duties and order.

Superstition ; Belief in external objective law and morality. Superstition is a good way for Jewish authors of this book to demean the dominant religion of our people: Christianity. For men this means religiosity; visible religiosity, establish dinner with your family with a prayer, make it so evident that you are obeying objective morality that your family will never mistrust you as a hypocrite; they can have faith in you – as you lead them to the Lord.

LeePower and “toughness” ; An extension of authoritarianism but on a personal level; valuing the sense of firmness and stability in life – Something all husbands must have if women are to feel secure with you. If a woman thinks you’re a big crybaby that cant handle the weight of the world; how is she going to expect you to protect her from the world?

Cynicism ; Cynicism is a general distrust of other people; in Politics this means cabals, foreigners and vested interests. For a man this is an important value; For security and comfort of the family a man must be very cynical with the presence of other people, particularly men and women of low moral character.

Projectivity ; Asserting authority and dominance over your family and community. The opposite of this is virtue-signalling how weak, tolerant and passive you are. A Projective, Authoritarian male strikes fear into all his enemies just by virtue of his own confidence. A Projective and loving husband makes a family feel safe and orderly. There’s no question of who is the head of the household, Who is the protector and who establishes the natural order; Do not confuse this for abuse, You can be projective without beating your wife you idiots!

Read more

Nationalism in our new century has been held back significantly on many questions; and among those of most significance is the question of race; many struggle to understand why race is actually a fundamental variable in the structure and form of society.

Race: as defined by gsuburbs-gardening-happy-family-wmkeneral demographic groups differentiated by genealogy affects the median IQ, Physical characteristics and heritage of a person, and these three factors play significant roles in determining the nature of society and the individuals within it.

Richard Lynn’s controversial 2006 book “Race Differences in Intelligence” performed a compilation of IQ testing for over 813,778 individuals of different racial and ethnic backgrounds, this long-term study found that an individuals IQ could be closely correlated with their race; these studies often find criticism on the grounds of socio-economic status: Left-wing agitators will proclaim that the studies are wrong because “Negroes score badly because they’re so poor” – the studies in reality reveal that Asiatics, who often live in destitute poverty still have a much higher median IQ than those of first-world, well fed and educated white people.

It is self evident that a society of people of higher IQ’s will contain more scientific, social, cultural and artistic advancement than those of a lower IQ; too will they be able to organise society in such a structure that they achieve maximum cohesion and economic progress. Australia aught to avoid importing those who are: on average, of a significantly lower IQ for such important reasons.

IQ

Physical characteristics also play a significant role in the constitution of the Australian society: Although race includes different skeletal structures, muscle mass and other various physical traits: the most significant and obvious difference is the colour of skin. Yes, Skin colour does matter!

Western, often democratic nations were established on the base premise that there would be a strong sense of civic duty; that the sense of identity and belonging in nations would be so firm that we would see our neighbors and towns as an extension of our own families: this sentiment was implicit; and was always presumed to be the norm. Multi-racialism has destroyed such utopian ideals, no quantity of propaganda can produce a common sense of identity between blacks and whites. Propaganda cannot create a sense of belonging between people who by their birth belong to different races!

8f6a1a3872e3b970649d744cd513a131No “Australian Citizenship Card” can unify all races, cultures and religions seamlessly. It is a fact of nature that people, even babies as suggested by a U.S Study : have a natural sense of belonging to other members of their own race as selected by racial characteristics. Community and multi-racialism cannot exist simultaneously, If you want a society that has a high sense of belonging and civic duty, you cannot permit the homogeneity of the community to be shattered by foreign races that can be distinguished by appearance.

Heritage; whilst an important factor is less of a visible influence on the sense of community identity: Societies with mixed heritages in almost all circumstances a cause for more atomisation and less belonging: A singular White Australian identity was promoted in order to abolish the conflicts of the old-world ethnicities: A White Australia tries at all ends to silence the conflicts between English and Irish and Scots and everyone else to maximise community sentiment; A single ethnic identity can be produced if you all share the same physical characteristics as defined by race. You cannot assimilate peoples of another race as they are physically different and distinguishable as aliens to the members of the community.

Conclusively; Race is very important and fundamental to the order of society because we know that racial IQ differences make an enormous contribution to the material advancement and organisation of the nation: IQ and race for the moment cannot be separated by any kind of empirical study. We know physical differences as extreme as skin colour can lead to the dissolution of community identity and belonging and can lead down the road of balkanisation of any country. Societies of mixed heritage can only be assimilated if they share the same racial characteristics; as those of other races are easily identified as aliens by those of the community.

1

Read more

Australia stands on her toes with a sharp blade to her throat. Compromise on the issue of race for much longer will lead to the death of her body; Too the defilement of the heritage and identity she so wished to bestow upon her children.

The face of dissapointmentThe Eureka Youth League; more than just a network of Young Australian Nationalists – is the central anchor for our generation; the anchor that says No More to racial compromise; We say no more to race-mixing,  globalism and atomisation of the Australian youth.

With the decades to come from today; the older generations, radically anchored to neo-globalist liberalism will die out, their control over society will fade and dwindle, leaving only the radically polarised younger generations – To the learned man, all he must do is look and compare the youth movements of the two, so called “mainstream” parties to see the future.

The Young Liberal movement is  a refuge for globalist materialistic atheists; The sort that will go red in the face and screetch and squeel over the issues of free trade vs protectionism. The sort that argues ‘True Western’ ideals are those that protect the liberty of sodomites and perverts. Young Liberals will consider you “Solid” if you aren’t communist-lite. I’m sure there’s lots of Solid faggots in the Young Liberal Movement.

 

The Young Labor movement has been wholesale overrun by Communist-globalists. From Sodomites to Feminists ; it seems clear there is no bastion of Labor tradition in the Young Labor movement. Obsessed with fighting the culture war and abolishing any last bastion of White Christian Australia.Flags copy

The Eureka Youth League however, growing in numbers and organisation strength across the country offers a true hope for straight-thinking Australians of a younger age. We’re not going to fight by the teeth over issues of Economics or Party Politics – We’re an autonomous organisation for bringing together in cooperation, Young, Morally inclined White Australians.

The Eureka Youth League will never capitulate on the issue of race; it – like the Australian tradition: is in our very DNA.

Read more

Spence meme

Division on the basis of ideological loyalty to an economic platform has been one of the largest issues facing the new development of the new Australian nationalist movement. Given the origins of our movement is often found in the dregs of Libertarianism; There’s oftien fierce conflict on the issues of economic policy between the new-Nationalists and the old or traditional-Nationalists.

Australia deserves better from us; Nationalists need to learn to put aside their economic differences and learn to unite for our first and foremost goal: A White Australia.

Racial integrity is absolutely irreversible; if we are weak and divided because of our economic differences in time there will be nothing left worth defending: If All Nationalists learn to treat each-other with respect with regards to ideological differences regarding economics: We shall be an unstoppable force, unified in our advocacy for a racially and culturally homogeneous Australia.

whiteaus

So next time before you start a fight over Economics; pat him on the back and agree to disagree: Once we have driven the foreign hordes from our shores; then we can be free to punch each-other in the nose for economic issues.

M. K. Grant
EYL President

 

Read more

r.w.t.saturdaymarket1

Why Young Nationalism in Australia must stay the course towards healthy and decent Australian Nativism, and not Pseudo-Germanophilic National Socialism

In my correspondence with young Nationalist circles across the country I have found an enormous and sometimes painful lack of historical knowledge regarding the Australian traditions, What exactly our Identity is, where it got started and who the men where who defended it: This simple lack of knowledge is an absolutely innocent sin given the knowledge that the Global media, including the “new right’s” media has overwhelmed and knocked down any historical sentiment of the Australian form, sure there is a bastion here and there – but in reality most of what we young Australian Nationalists had started off in learning is straight from George Lincoln Rockwell’s “This Time the World” or a nice Saturday BBQ with “The Greatest Story Never Told” or to the more newish members of the movement, it was more likely a Donald Trump to The Dingoes pathway of worldview.

For this reason; We had never picked up the tools and historical knowledge that was left to us by OUR forebears. Unless you’re a German or a Yankee or Dixieland Rebel; the history of other countries: whilst important of course; should never take precidence over the importance of the history of our very own founders:

What some may not realise; is Racial Nationalism is in the VERY DNA of Australianism. Whereas in the United States and in Europe, Racial politics was very much a shortlived idealism of the 20th century in most cases. Australianism on the other hand, grew out of the middle of the 19th Century; during the times when Asians poured into this country from every which nation in the Pacific.

When white men in Queensland were driven out of work due to Materialistically inclined Capitalists importing cheap Kanakka(Islander) workers from the sea to make a larger profit margin on Sugar.

When the Chinese flooded the goldfields, and soonafter dominated most manufacturing industries in Victoria.

42220697

The connection to the soil which our forefathers cultivated and spilled their own lives and limbs for has now been split in half by the Globalist media forces that surround us; on every hand we see Young Australians more engaged in the politics of the United States than we do of our own country “Because its boring” they say: Rubbish!

Australian history is full of the most glorious tales of the racial nationalist struggle. Whether it was at the Eureka Rebellion or the Lambings Flats Rebellions in which White men stood together for a whole new idealism, a Nationally-orientated, racial communitarianism.

From there was the march to federation; Following the Henry Parkes ban on Chinese Immigration, and the Victorian ban, both states found difficulty dealing with the fact that Chinese immigrants were still pouring in through South Australia.

A Common Border ! A federal Government to control all immigration, and keep it White too!

The very first bill which was brought before the newly formed Australian Federal Government was infact the Immigration Restriction Bill of 1901; in which our Prime Minister Edmund Barton spoke at lengths to defend.

” I need make no apology for calling this one of the most important matters with regard to the future of Australia that can engage the attention of this House, nor can I emphasize too strongly the necessity that those who desire legislation in this direction should endeavour to put aside their minor differences, in order to secure the acceptance and passage of a law which will be in the main effective for its purposes.”

We were struggling among ourselves for supremacy in a world which we thought of as destined to belong to the Aryan races and to the Christian faith ; to the letters and arts and charm of social manners which we have inherited from the best times of the past. We shall wake to find ourselves elbowed and hustled, and perhaps even thrust aside by peoples whom we looked down upon as servile, and thought of as bound always to minister to our needs. The solitary consolation will be that the changes have been inevitable.

Is that not something to guard against ? I do not pretend to say that there is any immediate danger of that kind, but unless we are careful dangers of that kind are inevitable as time goes on. I do not want to exaggerate them in any way. I do not want to pretend that unless we pass this Bill today we shall have these people coming in in such volume as to overflow and throng our marts, our fields, and all places of our industry. But it is enough that if we do not take action and take it speedily, both the commercial and industrial difficulties of this kind of labour will be growing tendencies which we shall one day repent our not having checked. These are not new opinions of mine ; I have expressed them over and over again, and hold them as strongly, and I think even more strongly, with reference to the prevention of certain Asiatic influxes, as I did when a youth.

Now; How does that compare to a speech by Donald Trump? Still not interesting enough?

How about the words of The Father of Australia himself, Henry Parkes:

“For a generation – long before some of the men who are listening to me took any part whatever in public life – and. at all times, I have opposed the introduction of Chinese upon these, as I conceive, national, and to a large extent, philosophical grounds. I maintain that in a country like New South Wales it is our duty to preserve the type of the British nation, and that we ought not, for any consideration whatever, to admit any element that would detract from, or in any appreciable degree lower, that admirable type of nationality. ”

“if this young nation is to maintain the fabric of its liberties unassailed and unimpaired, it cannot admit into its population any element that of necessity must be of an inferior nature and character. In other words, I have maintained at all times that we should not encourage or admit amongst us any class of persons whatever whom we are not prepared to advance to all our franchises, to all our privileges as citizens, and all our social rights, including the right of marriage. I maintain that no class of persons should be admitted here, so far as we can reasonably exclude them, who cannot come amongst us, take up all our rights, perform on the ground of equality all our duties, and share in our august and lofty work of founding a free nation.”

Perhaps from the Labor party; James Stewart:

We have coloured people in every State, or about 100,000 in all Australia. They are coming into Western Australia in large numbers ; they are in South Australia, Victoria, New South Wales, and Queensland, and I believe there are a few in Tasmania. Given the necessary opportunity, in the course of events we shall have a coloured problem here just as dangerous to the welfare of the Commonwealth as is the position which faces the people of the United States.

We do not desire to keep out these coloured people simply because they are inferior to us, but because for racial, social and economic reasons we cannot permit them safely to enter. With regards to race, we cannot mix with them. There is no natural affinity between them and us. If an attempt were made to confide them and us within one bottle, so to speak, one or the other must be precipitated to the bottom. A compacted homogenous community cannot be formed out of such heterogenous compounds. The thing ought not to be attempted, because it is. absolutely impossible.

With regards to the social aspect of the question, these people are brought up under institutions entirely different from ours. Their religion, position and customs are different;

I should be a traitor to my country, to my race and to those of our ancestors who have conferred benefits upon us, if I were a party to anything which would allow these Asiatics to come here and destroy at one fell swoop all the efforts of centuries. For these reasons I think, we are all agreed that the coloured man must be kept out, whether he is Japanese, a Chinaman or an African.

This is really a matter of life and death to the Australian people.

It was almost an entire unanimous vote for the passing of the Immigration restriction bill; and for the following 72 years it would be a struggle to the death between firm men who were Australianists at heart and weak, debauched crooks who fetishised alienism.

For the better part of the century; it was the Australian Labor Party who were the foremost, staunch defenders of the White Australia Policy ( as it had become known ) – Arthur Calwell always at the head of the spear to defend Australianism as we know it today.

White Australia

Arthur Calwell, the leader of the Australian Labor Party and a hero for all Australian Nativists spoke clearly about the importance of a WHITE Australia:

“There is no evidence, anywhere on the face of the earth, that great aggregations of peoples of widely differing culture and ideals can live together in one community in peace and mutual prosperity.”

Underlying the White Australia Policy is no suggestion of racial superiority; It began as a posiitve aspiration, and from it has resulted in a united race of freedom-loving Australians who can inter-marry and associate without the disadvantages that inevitably result from the fusion of dissimular races; we are a united people who share the same loyalties, the same outlook and the same traditions.

If Australians are ever foolish enough to open their gates in a significant way to people other than Europeans; they will soon find themselves fighting desperately to stop the nation from being flooded by hordes of non-integratables.

He among other heroes such as Alfred Deakin, William Lane, William Spence, King O’Malley, Jack Beasley and MANY others were the foreward voice for the White Australian people; having gone through approximately 120 years of a battle for White Australia; the battle never ends.

We’ve been let down by the last few generations; but that is only a small fraction of time in the grand struggle for a White and Free Australia.

So perhaps before you go wearing a swastika armband and pick up a copy of Mein Kampf; you should first consider reading the words of our forefathers first: These men who through their own devices managed to secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. ( For about 120 years anyway )

Suggested Reading Includes:

“Be Just and Fear Not” Arthur A. Calwell

“National Life and Character” Charles H. Pearson

“White Australia, SAVED Australia” Jack Lang

“Fifty Points for an Australia-First Party after the war.” Percy Stephensen

And let us not forget; the never-ending resources found on the National Library’s Trove database.

Hope you enjoyed the read, and were perhaps persuaded by it slightly.

God bless.

M. K. Grant
EYL President

newspaper newspaper2

 

 

 

Read more

Alfred W Eustace

Appeasement; Or in the context of Australian Nationalism: Lies

Racially-based Nationalism like ours is evidently a ferociously spooky topic to talk about; not only do you invoke the risk of legal punishment by the application of the anti-discrimination act: But you too invoke the risk of social ostricism; given such topics are socially frowned upon by the sum result of media/government indoctrination of the Australian people.

We have no intention of going into the public with a ‘moderated’ message of civic nationalism, or the wonders of homosexuality or the ‘righteous’ cause of zionism or the progressive greatness of race mixing.


When you truly value the ideal of a White, Moral Australia; you cannot effectively see to its revival; By selling a message of ‘anti-racism’ and radical tolerance to immorality – Even whilst simeltaneously fighting a righteous cause: ie; Islamic immigration – you have infact created a brand new movement that truly believes in the things you have said; this includes the ‘anti-racist’ rhetoric you have chanted to try and prove how ‘un-racist’ you are.

If you raise up an army of ‘anti-racist’ ; ‘pro-tolerance’ civic patriots; and then you decide now is the hour to convert them into true Australian Nationalists; you will have to unpeel that branded facemask you were wearing that had the big word “non-racist” on it; When people see the true face under the mask, they will be disgusted and angry in the knowledge that they had been led into such hardship by a person who was lying about the topics of Racism and Immorality straight to their face.


If you believe these people CAN ONLY be sold the message of ‘anti-racism’ then you will never build a White Australia with them anyway; unless you believe a non-islamic mud-blooded homosexual dystopia is a noble version of a Moral White Australia that you should try create to avoid being called a ‘racist nazi bigot’

 

 

Read more

Race-Mixing; the Crime against God, Humanity and Civilisation

The face of dissapointment

The face of dissapointment

Recent times have revealed unto us some very interesting trends indeed; although it appears whites still maintain a natural trend to prefer dating with their own race in some cases ( Thank God! ) ; there seems to be more and more efforts to change this natual, and healthy trend:

Recently it seems SBS; the semi-taxpayer funded organisation ran by two foreigners; one a homosexual and one of them a muslim: are in the works to launch a branch new treasure amonst the elitist anti-white media machine.

The new TV Documentary Series “Date My Race”; Which right from the title itself seems quite interested in promoting and normalising the absolute savage act of Miscegenation.

Why Race Mixing is sick and evil:

From an entirely secular point of view; in light of simple common sense understanding of statistics and sociology; We can claim in absolute confidence the following facts:

  • Mongrelised children can never fully identify as a member of one particular race; inevtiably meaning their loyalties will always be of question and they will find increased difficulty of embracing the culture of that race.
  • Mongrelised children can never be part of a racially homogenous society; given their physical appearance is so far different; the natural tendency to form a common identity is far removed; not only harming the child at hand; but the greater community at large.
  • Mongrelised chilren have far greater statistical chances of growing up with a mental illness like autism
  • Wholesale mongrelisation of a nation will absolutely destroy their adherence to their cultural, racial traditions; leading from the Karl Marx quote: “Take away a nation’s heritage and they are more easily persuaded”

Race Mixing; is the manifestation of self-indulgence – just as homosexuality; the Race Mixer will fulfill their own sexual desires at no consideration to the cost it will charge the nation or the well-being of their very own mongrelised children.

Drive this badboy around and show the other lads how you feel on the race mixing issue

Drive this badboy around and show the other lads how you feel on the race mixing issue

 

Read more