In defense of Australianism: A Letter to the Trotskyites

Our organisation; is not a ‘conservative’ one – it never has been; We see through the same lens you and I and so I can speak in your terms- though we come to a different ‘call to arms’ as it may be said: There can be no doubt, the modern world is an evil, corrupted place – the core enemy which most of us share is really the neo-liberal establishment, where all people, including you and me are seen as individual units of capital, we are no more than shares in the global financial system, which has become rootless and unstoppable thanks to the works of the ‘conservative’ ‘anti-communist’ units in Government.

Australian Nativists believe there is far more to life than wage-slavery to the neoliberal, land-barons who currently rule over us uncontested – we believe wholeheartedly in community living as you do; although we believe in the practical, the real and the observed; We believe in taking steps to maximise the sense of common identity and belonging between members of the community, ie; we believe homogeneous societies share the strongest sense of community, that by natural circumstance we feel more trusting, at home with and compassionate to people of our own ethnicity, religiosity and worldview. William Spence, founder of the Australian Labor Party & Workers Union gave us the platform: “The cultivation of an Australian sentiment based upon the maintenance of racial purity and the development in Australia of an enlightened and self-reliant community.” Ultimately we do not hate others of different races, or religions – infact we have much to learn from each-other, but nonetheless we take a direction to maximise the sense of identity and belonging Australians can share, sharing the same blood, a similar European heritage, the same outlook on life.

We being Nationalists are not ‘imperialists’ ; we have no ambitions to conquer other nations; or harm other races – quite the opposite, it is our worldview which advocates for the sovereignty of all ethnicities, the protection of their own unique cultural and religious expression and the rights to their own land and wealth; Arthur Calwell the once leader of the Australian Labor Party said: “We can only preserve our heritage for our descendants by preserving the homogeneity of our race: And that we must and will do, We cherish no annexation ideas, We covet no other territory and we have no imperialist ambitions.” You will find it is the ‘conservatives’ who wish to install neoliberal capitalism onto countries by force, to profit off the sweat of their workers – we know, accept and repudiate this imperialism; it takes the jobs of Australian workers and leaves us to the social decay of alcoholism and fornication that comes in the town of depression due to unemployment.

You believe in ‘workers of the world unite’ – so do we, we do not believe the workers of the world should however harm themselves by throwing themselves into a melting pot which only seeks to serve the financial interests of the capitalist elite; by destroying community sentiment and identity the neoliberals render it impossible resistance to form against their usury and practice; this without mentioning they profit enormously by working coloured labor to death ( as they are willing to accept standards far below that of the white Australian man ) You believe ‘racism’ is a tool the neoliberals use to pit worker against worker and distract us from the destruction of our society; this point has a great deal of merit; Have you ever wondered why the media perpetuates anti-islamic sentiment? 

It’s a mighty fine distraction from the fact the Chinese, among a few other Asian ethnicities are buying up our land in droves, and demographically replacing us!  – that is to say; a white minority in Australia could be no more than 50 years away. The Neoliberal charges up the white man to attack the Islamic, although they only take up 5% of the population.  It keeps the well-intentioned white man from recognising the Chinese could make up 15% of our current population!

Coloured migration is a terrific weapon for smashing unions, drop ideals for moment and recognise it’s not the Indians and Chinese that make up the membership of your local workers union, it’s white men – and we’re being displaced by foreign coolies! Your cause for destroying ethnic borders; is a large chip in the arsenal of the neoliberals! 

Mary Gilmore, whom you may know from the glorious newspaper ‘The Australian Worker’ wrote in her poem ‘The White Man’s flag’ “Nations and  individuals, degenerate like this, they have but one god, and that is gold. The gold of cheap labor. Their cry is ‘The black is cheaper than the white. Up with the black, down with ‘the white!’A day will come . if this policy is followed when the black financier will say the same thing to the white— and win! — if white does not stand by white.” If you truly have a positive aspiration for Australian workers, you must accept that we cannot be thrown into the basket with non-unionised coloured labour who will settle for ridiculous standards of employment: such an action would destroy everything our forebears worked to establish!

Australian Nativists very much rest on the shoulders of the traditional Australian Labor Party, we love and revere the union working tradition but absolutely detest the globalism that the modern Labor party pursues, it is this ‘globalism’ they engage for “compassion” but they do not realise it simply makes them the puppet of the neoliberals, flooding Australia with cheap foreign labour to erode our standards, giving buckets of our blood to foreign refugees whilst our own sleep rough on each street corner. The bourgeois profit most from this destruction of Australia, cheap labour, plenty of domestic demand for housing and smashed unions! what a miracle, they got the well-intentioned Marxists to nail themselves into the coffin of multi-racialism and bury themselves on the hill of progress!

Now you may understand our position in a degree of clarity; we wish to open a genuine dialogue – should you have the decency to engage.

Ask any question in honesty related to history and our ideals; and it will be answered publicly ( Or privately if you wish ) :

( Perhaps we may agree to disagree one day and bury the hatchet and see decency prevail in politics once again; Decency, another old Australian tradition. )

Arthur Calwell, the once leader of the Australian Labor party said in 1949:

The ultra-conservatives and land-barons would like vast poois of near-slave labor to make them richer; the Communists wish to bring about any condition of strife, poverty and mistrust in the community which would make good government more difficult, and therefore their struggle towards power easier.

The Communists base their appeals on the sympathy Australians feel for the poor and oppressed in backward countries. They preach equality, but Ignore tile fact that equality does not necessarily mean similarity, or the ability to live and work together.

They talk cynically of relief and new opportunities for the suffering people of Asian lands, when they know very well that whatever small number of the needy millions could possibly be taken into Australia would have no significant effect on the Asian problem.

They plead that these people should be offered a better life, when there is evidence all over the world to prove that the introduction of large numbers of Asians into European communities inevitably offers them nothing but frustration and new sorts of misery.

In this particular matter, the super-capitalists are even less honest than the Communists. If they used the Communist arguments, or any direct arguments at all, their motives would be so obvious that the only public response would be an outburst of astonished laughter at their audacity.

Except in unguarded moments when the truth sometimes bursts out of them, they have to pay lip-service to the Australian policy, but they have developed a loathsome cunning in the arts of the saboteur and the wrecker. “We believe in the selective immigration policy, but . . .“ is the way they approach the matter, though they know as well as I do that there can be no “buts” in connection with it at all. They strive to have “exceptions” made until the policy would become unworkable, and to have “discretion” exercised so indiscreetly that the basic principles of the policy would have to be abandoned.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.